Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:04

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How is ice climbing a different or similar experience from rock climbing?
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is now available for purchase in the US - GSMArena.com news - GSMArena.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Does Mars have a moon? - Live Science
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Logan Gilbert sees velocity dip in rehab start | Mariners injury updates - The Seattle Times
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Nightmare Hair Situation Antonia Gentry Endured On "Ginny & Georgia" Is Going Viral - BuzzFeed
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.